Tag: legal

  • Lawfull Prompting

    Companies like Uber Eats do not have the intention to manage lawful operation. Right now (2025-2026) the company is aggresively trying to prove that ai can replace office and worker personnel in the Netherlands and other places.

    When UberEATS started a partnership with OpenAI in the summer of 2025, the first thing that became apparant to delivery workers is that Uber had zero intention to use the new capabilities to improve the work and make delivery a good experience for customers, restaurants and the cities they are allowed to operate in.

    The availability of powerful ai capabilities to Uber HQ personnel has resulted in a new form of personalized worker exploitation.

    One of the ways to combat this inhumane form of worker rights abuse is that politicial leaders can legally bind companies to inject legal documents into the prompts that uber teams have recklessly started to use.

    The age of simple algorithms is over. Companies havw started using ai prompts to manage work. There are no managers: its all ai agents.

    However legal oversight is straightforward and easy. Simply make it legally required to inject all prompts with legal documents, especially for incompetent companies like UberEATS and all companies that use the new tech that interfaces with workers.